Molecular Biology of the Cell Call for Nominations: MBC Editor-in-Chief

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published as MBC in Press, 10.1091/mbc.E02-04-0203 on July 16, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
E02-04-0203v1
13/9/3029    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warren, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warren, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, F. A.

Vol. 13, Issue 9, 3029-3041, September 2002

Distinct Chromosome Segregation Roles for Spindle Checkpoint Proteins

Cheryl D. Warren,*dagger D. Michelle Brady,§ Raymond C. Johnston,§ Joseph S. Hanna,* Kevin G. Hardwick,§ and Forrest A. Spencer*Dagger ||

 *McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine,  dagger Predoctoral Training Program in Human Genetics and Molecular Biology, and  Dagger Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205; and  §Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

The spindle checkpoint plays a central role in the fidelity of chromosome transmission by ensuring that anaphase is initiated only after kinetochore-microtubule associations of all sister chromatid pairs are complete. In this study, we find that known spindle checkpoint proteins do not contribute equally to chromosome segregation fidelity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Loss of Bub1 or Bub3 protein elicits the largest effect. Analysis of Bub1p reveals the presence of two molecular functions. An N-terminal 608-amino acid (nonkinase) portion of the protein supports robust checkpoint activity, and, as expected, contributes to chromosome segregation. A C-terminal kinase-encoding segment independently contributes to chromosome segregation through an unknown mechanism. Both molecular functions depend on association with Bub3p. A 156-amino acid fragment of Bub1p functions in Bub3p binding and in kinetochore localization by one-hybrid assay. An adjacent segment is required for Mad1p binding, detected by deletion analysis and coimmunoprecipitation. Finally, overexpression of wild-type BUB1 or MAD3 genes leads to chromosome instability. Analysis of this activity indicates that the Bub3p-binding domain of Bub1p contributes to this phenotype through disruption of checkpoint activity as well as through introduction of kinetochore or spindle damage.


|| Corresponding author. E-mail address: fspencer{at}jhmi.edu.


Molecular Biology of the Cell
Vol. 13, 3029-3041, September 2002
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Cell Biology






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]