|
|
|
|
Vol. 15, Issue 11, 4892-4903, November 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




||
* Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599;
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599;
Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; and
Program in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
Submitted March 4, 2004;
Revised August 11, 2004;
Accepted August 17, 2004
Monitoring Editor: Mark Solomon
Cullin-dependent ubiquitin ligases regulate a variety of cellular and developmental processes by recruiting specific proteins for ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Cullin proteins form a scaffold for two functional modules: a catalytic module comprised of a small RING domain protein Roc1/Rbx1 and a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2), and a substrate recruitment module containing one or more proteins that bind to and bring the substrate in proximity to the catalytic module. Here, we present evidence that the three Drosophila Roc proteins are not functionally equivalent. Mutation of Roc1a causes lethality that cannot be rescued by expression of Roc1b or Roc2 by using the Roc1a promoter. Roc1a mutant cells hyperaccumulate Cubitus interruptus, a transcription factor that mediates Hedgehog signaling. This phenotype is not rescued by expression of Roc2 and only partially by expression of Roc1b. Targeted disruption of Roc1b causes male sterility that is partially rescued by expression of Roc1a by using the Roc1b promoter, but not by similar expression of Roc2. These data indicate that Roc proteins play nonredundant roles during development. Coimmunoprecipitation followed by Western or mass spectrometric analysis indicate that the three Roc proteins preferentially bind certain Cullins, providing a possible explanation for the distinct biological activities of each Drosophila Roc/Rbx.
|| Corresponding author. E-mail address: duronio{at}med.unc.edu.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J. Radford, E. Goley, K. Baxter, S. McMahan, and J. Sekelsky Drosophila ERCC1 Is Required for a Subset of MEI-9-Dependent Meiotic Crossovers Genetics, August 1, 2005; 170(4): 1737 - 1745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kamura, K. Maenaka, S. Kotoshiba, M. Matsumoto, D. Kohda, R. C. Conaway, J. W. Conaway, and K. I. Nakayama VHL-box and SOCS-box domains determine binding specificity for Cul2-Rbx1 and Cul5-Rbx2 modules of ubiquitin ligases Genes & Dev., December 15, 2004; 18(24): 3055 - 3065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||