Molecular Biology of the Cell track citations

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published as MBC in Press, 10.1091/mbc.E06-11-0994 on June 6, 2007

Vol. 18, Issue 8, 3094-3104, August 2007

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Materials
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
E06-11-0994v1
18/8/3094    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buster, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buster, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, D. J.

Poleward Tubulin Flux in Spindles: Regulation and Function in Mitotic CellsFormula Formula

Daniel W. Buster, Dong Zhang, and David J. Sharp

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461

Submitted November 8, 2006; Revised May 24, 2007; Accepted May 29, 2007
Monitoring Editor: Yixian Zheng

The poleward flux of tubulin subunits through spindle microtubules is a striking and conserved phenomenon whose function and molecular components remain poorly understood. To screen for novel components of the flux machinery, we utilized RNA interference to deplete regulators of microtubule dynamics, individually and in various combinations, from S2 cells and examined the resulting impact on flux rate. This led to the identification of two previously unknown flux inhibitors, KLP59C and KLP67A, and a flux promoter, Mini-spindles. Furthermore, we find that flux rate is regulated by functional antagonism among microtubule stabilizers and destabilizers specifically at plus ends. Finally, by examining mitosis on spindles in which flux has been up- or down-regulated or restored after the codepletion of antagonistic flux regulators, we show that flux is an integral contributor to anaphase A but is not responsible for chromosome congression, interkinetochore tension, or the establishment of normal spindle length during prometaphase/metaphase.

This was published online ahead of print in MBC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E06-11-0994) on June 6, 2007.

Formula Formula The online version of this article contains supplemental material at MBC Online (http://www.molbiolcell.org).

Address correspondence to: David J. Sharp (dsharp{at}aecom.yu.edu).

Abbreviations used: FRAP, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Cell Biol.Home page
G. Yang, L. A. Cameron, P. S. Maddox, E. D. Salmon, and G. Danuser
Regional variation of microtubule flux reveals microtubule organization in the metaphase meiotic spindle
J. Cell Biol., August 25, 2008; 182(4): 631 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2007 by The American Society for Cell Biology. Terms of copyright protection, warranties, and disclaimers.