|
|
|
|
Vol. 18, Issue 5, 1887-1896, May 2007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
/
1 and
/
2 Hemicomplexes of Clathrin Adaptors AP-1 and AP-2 Harbor the Dileucine Recognition Site



Departments of a*Internal Medicine and
Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
Submitted January 10, 2007;
Revised February 22, 2007;
Accepted March 1, 2007
Monitoring Editor: Sandra Schmid
The clathrin adaptors AP-1 and AP-2 bind cargo proteins via two types of motifs: tyrosine-based Yxx
and dileucine-based [DE]XXXL[LI]. Although it is well established that Yxx
motifs bind to the µ subunits of AP-1 or AP-2, dileucine motifs have been reported to bind to either the µ or
subunits of these adaptors as well as the
/
1 hemicomplex of AP-1. To clarify this controversy, the various subunits of AP-1 and AP-2 were expressed individually and in hemicomplex form in insect cells, and they were used in glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays to determine their binding properties. We report that the
/
1 or
/
2 hemicomplexes bound the dileucine-based motifs of several proteins quite strongly, whereas binding by the
1/µ1 and
2/µ2 hemicomplexes, and the individual
or µ subunits, was extremely weak or undetectable. The
/
1 and
/
2 hemicomplexes displayed substantial differences in their preference for particular dileucine-based motifs. Most strikingly, an aspartate at position 4 compromised binding to the
/
1 hemicomplex, whereas minimally affecting binding to
/
2. There was an excellent correlation between binding to the
/
2 hemicomplex and in vivo internalization mediated by the dileucine-based sorting signals. These findings provide new insights into the trafficking mechanisms of D/EXXXL[LI]-mediated sorting signals.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Address correspondence to: Stuart Kornfeld (skornfel{at}im.wustl.edu)