|
|
|
|
Cover Rapid movement of intracellular "particles" within animal and plant
cells was observed by the light microscope dating back to its
invention. The first molecular component involved in such movement was
clearly identified by three laboratories in the mid-1980s as
microtubules (Hayden, J.H., and Allen, R.D. [1984]. J. Cell Biol.
99, 1785-1793; Koonce, M.P., and Schliwa, M. [1985]. J. Cell Biol. 100, 322-326; Schnapp, B., et al.
[1985]. Cell 40, 455-462). The experimental approach used
by these three groups all involved a technically demanding strategy of
combining video light microscopy (invented by S. Inoue and R. Allen
only a few years earlier) with electron microscopy. In two studies, directed organelle transport was first visualized in living cells either along "linear elements" discerned by video microscopy
(Hayden and Allen, 1984) or within extremely narrow cell processes
(Koonce and Schliwa, 1985). Another study (Schnapp et al.,
1985) visualized organelle transport along linear elements in squid
axoplasm in vitro. Because the resolution of light microscopy is ~200
nm, these observations could not discern the molecular nature of the filament or reveal whether a single filament or bundle of cytoskeletal elements was involved. Resolving these issues required the electron microscopy. To accomplish this task in a convincing manner, all three
laboratories first visualized organelle transport along a filament by
video microscopy using a "marked" grid, fixed the preparation, and
then found the exact same filament by electron microscopy. The cover
(Figure 3 from Schnapp et al., 1985) shows a pair of
"transport filaments" (at a ~150° angle) visualized first by
video microscopy (left) and then by rapid freezing, rotary-shadowing electron microscopy (right) (smaller, nontransporting neurofilaments are indicated by arrows). The bottom image shows a higher-magnification view of the transport filament (corresponding to the box in the upper
portion of the low-magnification image). The size and substructure of
the transport filament seen in this and the other two studies revealed
that it was a single microtubule. All three studies also reported the
intriguing finding that bidirectional organelle transport occurred
along single microtubules. Collectively, these studies set the stage
for the reconstitution of organelle transport along purified
microtubules and the identification of two opposite polarity motors
(kinesin and cytoplasmic dynein) that powered bidirectional motion.
Subsequent work indicated that organelle transport can occur along
actin filaments as well (Kuznetsov, S.A., Langford, G.M., and Weiss,
D.G. [1992]. Nature 356, 722-725). It is interesting to
note that the above studies used very different cell types from the far
reaches of the animal kingdom (corneal keratocytes from frog [Hayden
and Allen, 1984], the giant freshwater ameba Reticulomyxa [Koonce and
Schliwa, 1985], and the squid giant axon [Schnapp et al.,
1985]). In this epoch in which biological studies are becoming
compressed to a few model organisms with heavily sequenced genomes,
these papers remind us of how cell biological insights can be made on
"unusual" organisms that lack genetic tools but possess unique
biological features.
Ron Vale, Howard Hughes Medical Institute
and Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco